It would be possible for your defence lawyer to argue that you acted to prevent a crime, and if the court accepts the argument, you would be acquitted. However, it is not a crime for Mario to celebrate with Maria, no matter how far they go; The age of consent in the Philippines generally appears to be 12 and in cases of “violence, threat or intimidation” 18, which seems unlikely here. Their actions were therefore legally unjustifiable. Do we have the right to do that? When my son says, “I`m going to punch you in the face when I saw you there,” is that considered a threat? PS: This is for educational purposes only, and the situation happened in real life. I am not in this situation, but out of curiosity, I wanted to know what my rights are when something like this happens to me, considering that I am Mary`s father. You don`t go to court if you walk into a house at 1 a.m. to save a 15-year-old girl who is being held against her will. But if you break down the door at a birthday party and threaten the clown because you`ve changed your mind, let your 9-year-old go to a party. You are likely to be arrested. If your “child” is a legal adult (which they may or may not be at age 16) and is in this house on their own, that`s another matter. At 1 a.m., while his older brother (20) and I were already resting, someone knocked on my door and told me that Mario (already drunk) would pass my daughter with someone.
So I woke up his older brother to pick up his sister from this house. As the Fourth Amendment makes clear, law enforcement agencies can enter a home to search or arrest a person if they have a warrant based on probable cause signed by a neutral, distant judge (now called a judge). But even without a warrant, law enforcement can enter a home, with a few other exceptions. As mentioned earlier, consent is the most common exception to applying for an injunction. People are regularly nervous when talking to the police and often agree to a search, even if they have something to hide. In any event, I am never in favour of accepting a search because it is an invasion of privacy no matter what. Again, you don`t have to agree. When it comes to finding apartments and apartments, the boundaries are somewhat blurred when it comes to fraternity houses. Often, fraternity houses are at least partially owned by the university itself, giving university officials or security forces the opportunity to allow access to the houses. In this situation, however, university officials do not have the authority to authorize a search of the individual rooms of the House of the Fraternity.
Again, people who live in rooms have a reasonable expectation of privacy in those rooms, and they cannot be searched without a Fourth Amendment exception. However, the common areas of the brotherhood houses are different and can be searched with valid consent. A fourth exception to the requirement for an arrest warrant is known as “urgent circumstances”. This is actually a secondary exception to probable causes because if an officer has reason to believe that evidence may be lost or destroyed in the time it takes to obtain a warrant, then he or she can legally search for the evidence or seize it. Again, this is usually the case when the public servant already has a probable reason, but it is a worthy exception in a separate category. One topic that is gaining momentum is blood sampling and other interventions in the human body. This issue is outside the scope of this section, but it is currently a hot topic of the Fourth Amendment, and often the government`s argument in these cases is urgent circumstances. However, courts have recently ruled that an arrest warrant is required to enter the human body, even in cases of possible driving under the influence of alcohol. However, even if you have a right of access to the property, law enforcement or the owner of the property may ask you to vacate the property. In these situations, it is important that you understand your rights in advance. You should read relevant local laws, familiarize yourself with the common law, and perhaps contact the police and other government agencies in the area to better understand your right to access different locations.
I was not there when they wrote this legislation, but I think I understand the reasoning. Suppose you see that your neighbor`s house is on fire and you rush to save your baby from the burn. No one in their right mind would say it was a crime. Or when a small child or a person with mental illness invades someone else`s house. Etc. A second widespread exception to the requirement for an arrest warrant is the “doctrine of public view”. This essentially means that if the police have probable reason to believe that they have publicly observed something that is contraband, then they have the legal right to enter and seize that item. Again, this is common when an object is clearly visible in a car or when it is easily visible through a window of a house.
It is also common for people to open the front door of their home during a “bang and talk”. If the officer observes an illegal object in sight, this gives him the right to enter and seize the object. Since the particles only stay in the air for a few hours maximum, it`s unlikely to be a problem if you go home to someone who is no longer contagious.